The O Powerful O
Oprah Winfrey, America’s favourite daytime TV star, has refused to have Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin as a guest on her talk show.
…
“When I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates,” she said in a statement.
Winfrey’s statement slammed reports on Drudge that there was a fierce debate going on among her staff about having Palin on as a guest. Winfrey called the story “categorically untrue” and said there had been no discussion about having Palin on during the election.
“I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over,” Winfrey said.
- stronger takes (0)
O, The Oprah Magazine
Letter from the Editor
9/7/08
Dear Readers,
I control the daytime television airwaves. I’m one of the most
respected voices of the African-American community in the United
States. I am the richest woman on Earth – that’s right, I’m still richer than J.K. Rowling and
she’s sold five trillion copies of Harry Potter.
So, what is there left for me to conquer?
I’ve decided to defy logic itself.
When I decided to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates.
But wait, isn’t taking a public stance for a candidate using my show as a platform for a candidate?
Yes.
Then…
Exactly.
What?
Oprah. There is no debate about whether or not Governor Palin will be a guest on my show.
But isn’t the very fact that you have to make a statement clearing up confusion on the matter proving that there is a debate?
What debate?
About having Governor Palin as a guest –
We have no guests.
Yes you do! You interview guests! You have a primarily female audience! It is ridiculous to say that her name wouldn’t have at least been mentioned as a possibility to –
I agree that Governor Palin would be a fantastic interview.
Yes! There you -
So that is why I cannot interview her.
What?!
Desire is suffering.
Wait, are you Buddhist or just being illogical? And why is this a conversation? Isn’t this a letter that you yourself are writing for the front of your magazine?
Why would I have a magazine?
Exactly! I don’t know! There is no reason that Oprah should have a magazine.
So perhaps I have already defied logic?
Yeah…yeah, I guess so.
You guess so? Or you guess O?
I guess O.
Do you guess O? Or do you know O?
I know O.
Do you know O? O do you O O?
I O O.
O,
O
recent tags
0-16    2009    30-year-old former nestle accountants    aggression    arson    baby alive    baby's first poopy    boneheaded choice of alliance    celebrities    china    colin firth    commerce    consumerism    detroit lions    douchebaggery    entertainment    football    frightening reality    holocaust movies    hugh grant    international relations    islam    jean-claude "baby doc" duvalier    lisa wisnefski's big sister    love, actually    michael vick    mostafa hosni    movies    new year's resolutions    offensive toys    oprah winfrey    politics    pooping doll    religion    rod blagojevich    roland burris    romantic comedy    rumors    russian hill    samuel l. jackson    san francisco    sanitation    scandal    scarlett johansson    sports    taxonomy    the last few remaining sentient humans    the worst football team of all time    tibet    tissues    toilets    toys    whether our efforts are usually doomed to failure   
Submit your own riff on this news source!